Hello again, John,
Here is the version of "Where did the pilots come from?"
With the end of WW-II, an enormous amount of pilots were out of the
cockpit and looking for a new peacetime career. True, some did stay in the
military, however, many found positions in the business community and
there were quite a few who took advantage of the GI Bill educational
benefits and returned to college. I suspect the AvCad program and
intensive pilot training pipeline was drastically curtailed. Your
knowledge of that era would be more accurate than mine. During the postwar
period, the Army Air Corps was changed to a separate service called the
United States Air Force. The missions and roles of the Air Force, Army,
Navy, and Marine Corps became very parochial.... each of their new air,
land, and sea areas of responsibility were heavily guarded turf.
Consequently, the Joint Chiefs of Staff was formed to iron out issues
where the "lines would be crossed".
The newest service, the United States Air Force (USAF), was organized into
commands depending on specific missions. Transportation requirements
became the mission of MATS, later changed to Military Airlift Copmmand
(MAC). Tactical type missions (air-to-air, air-to-ground, and close air
support of ground missions) belonged to Tactical Air Command (TAC). Heavy
bombardment had changed from "iron bombs" to nuclear deterrence, thus
Strategic Air Command came into being with General Curtis LeMay ( of WWII
fame with the B-17s) as their first commander. The multiple nuclear role
to be played by each of the services is too complicated to be included in
this brief scenario. Let it be said that many inter-service rivalries grew
out of the nuclear area which led to later intense "battles for ownership"
amongst the services. One has also to remember that many lessons were
learned from the "big war" and we entered into a period of research and
development on jet aircraft and missle production. We were also into a
whole new arena regarding test and development in all areas of weapon
development.
The pilot training program, although already greatly reduced, relied on
student pilot resources from college R.O.T.C. programs, the Aviation Cadet
Pilot Training Program, and just a few from West Point and Annapolis. (It
was unheard of that a Navy or Army academy graduate would even consider
taking a commission from the Air Force.) Until 1956, when the Air Force
Academy was established and the first class of cadets entered the
curriculum, demand for pilots was relatively low and could be managed with
resources that were available. As with all things, global change was very
evident and the U.S. was not about to revert to the "isolationist
policies" of the pre-WWII era. (Heaven forbid we would relinquish our
world power position, and the post war promises from Russia were soon to
be broken.)
Since the USAF Academy was starting to produce pilots around 1960, the
R.O.T.C. program was running at full tilt, and the other academies were
becoming more liberal regarding graduates becoming "Air Force Officers",
the AvCad program was under scrutiny as an unneeded cost. After all, we
now could produce pilots with college degrees and put their college
training to use in other areas of the services. We still were providing
pilot trainees from the Officer Candidate Program (OCS) for our enlisted
personnel, but this program, like the AvCad program, was to fall victim to
the college degree syndrome produced by the "Washington Think Tank Group".
Thus, the AvCad Class 61 Foxtrot was to be the last gasp for the Aviation
Cadet Flying Training Program. Because it was hoped that "foxtrotters"
would continue their formal education after training was completed, many
colleges and universities instituted the "Bootstrap" program. You could
attend college on your own time and get your degree, but not to interfere
with your military duties. The military would absorb the cost of obtaining
your degree. Therefore, the "last class of cadets" would have to achieve a
very high score on their Air Force Officer Qualifying Tests (AFOQTs).
These tests, as I'm sure you remember, were used to screen out those
without the officer skills being sought and subsequent flying accumen that
was needed. Most "foxtrotters" had two or more years of college and had to
score very high on their AFOQTs to be accepted. The physical portion was
also crucial as you had to have 20-20 vision and be in excellent physical
shape or you would be excluded. It was amazing how many potential cadets
never made it past the physical, even though they did well on the testing.
The "last class of cadets" suffered a very high attrition rate, allowing
only 25% of those starting Pre-Flight at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas,
to graduate fifteen months later as rated pilots and become second
lieutenants in the USAF. Those who didn't complete the training were
allowed to "wash back" for another try, sent off to navigator/bombadier
training, or return to active duty as an enlisted person.
Just a word about commitment: My recruiter told me the AvCad program had a
two year service commitment attached to it. Pappy tells me they told him
four years. While we were at Spence AB, GA, the Tactical Officer in charge
approached me regarding changing the original commitment from two to four
years and asked how would the cadets react to this change. As class
commandant, I rejected the proposal for the class and the Air Force lost
their case.
In the late 50s and early 60s, several factors were changing the face
of the aviation industry and many of our classmates were drawn into
commercial aviation. From a military standpoint, budgets were being cut
and obtaining flying time was vital if you were to succeed with a military
career. The requirements to meet the minimum of 100 hours a year, 1,000
hours by your seventh year, and 3,000 by your fifteenth year were not
about to be relaxed. Additionally, many of our college graduates with
business, aeronautical, and other engineering degrees were being terribly
underutilized in staff positions not worthy of their qualifications. Much
dissatisfaction was felt on how pilots were being treated. From a
commercial aviation standpoint, the jet age had become reality and was
rapidly growing as the common carrier mode of transportation. The
interstate highway system and the automobile cast the final blow to our
magnificent rail transportation system. The airlines were attracting
dissatisfied military pilots by the droves and cashing in on all that
"free training".
In retrospect, the AF was very vocal on needing college graduates and
not needing pilots. All we had to worry about was the cold war, not
attrition. Air Force pilots had become subject to the "Christmas Tree
Effect" on the tree of personnel management. Prior to 1965, a military
pilot's career was obviously in jeopardy. The rest of the story I'm sure
you know well. Viet Nam began to envelop our military, and pilots were
being recalled to the cockpit from their desk jobs (Of course they were
now not the highly trained killers we had spent so much money and time
training). National Guard and Reserve forces were being placed on active
duty and until 1973, when we exited our combat role in South East Asia, we
were always short of pilots. I know; I spent two combat tours in Nam.
After the
SEA conflict, the airlines continued to expand as did commercial aviation,
both on the air carrier and air cargo fronts. Again, the airline was
fortunate in that it drew many military pilots into "their cockpits".
Although it has had a minor impact on pilots, the NASA programs do draw
many talented people out of their cockpits. The downside is that pilot
starts in general aviation continue to fall short of meeting the demand.
The cost to attain a private or commercial pilot licence with all the
attendant "tickets" (ATP, Type ratings, Instrument qualifications, etc.)
comes at a very high price. While there is considerable hiring going on
within the airline (15,000 per year) industry, the pilots of the 60s are
now retiring. The military again is not producing the number of pilots it
used to and is having difficulty retaining what pilots they have. Unless
they offer huge bonuses to counter the airline opportunities, a pilot
shortage continues to exist. At the projected growth rate of 10% per year
in airline expansion, the problem can only become further exacerbated. As
our military role becomes more dominant on a global scale in a variety of
scenarios, one can only hope wisdom will prevail and we won't become
embroiled in being once again "behind the power curve".